Back home...






Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 167

Will the WYD final Mass be in Portuguese, not Latin?


 
PrayTellBlog reports that the Final Mass at World Youth Day in Rio this summer will be in Portuguese and not Latin. If true, this could be interesting on many levels, and not just for Youth Ministry.

I seriously hope they'll chuck in a few more languages though. Spanish is sure to get a good airing, right?

Movies: Fast and Furious 6


Fast and Furious 6 isn't going to be troubling the jury at Cannes or next spring's Oscar voters, but if you're looking for a seriously entertaining few hours with some brilliant action sequences and some really good laughs, it's probably the best thing in the cinema at the moment. It's certainly ahead of the Great Gatsby, which seriously disappointed me a few days back. Make no mistake, this movie isn't great art, but there's a lot to be said for silly-and-fun action movies that don't pretend to be anything else, and this is certainly one of those.

The first movie in the series came out in 2001, a year after another big car movie Gone in 60 Seconds. The two naturally drew comparisons, with the Fast and the Furious winning with critics and Gone in 60 Seconds, the remake of the 1974 classic, winning at the Box Office. Personally, I thought Gone in 60 was the better of the two, but the fact that the former movie has spawned 5 sequels, and another on the way in 2014, perhaps suggests that I got that one wrong!?

Anyway, the sixth instillment (the one in the cinema right now) picks up sometime after the events of Fast Five. Toretto (Vin Diesel) and O'Conner (Paul Walker) are trying their best to retire only to be drawn back into things by a friend in trouble and the lure of the excitement now denied to them in their more sedate lives. So far, a fairly typical sequel setup, but yet this is more than an excuse for a studio to make money from an established product. Well, okay, it's probably that too but my point is, it's also pretty good!

Toretto is approached by Special Agent Hobbs (Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson) and asked for his help in tracking down a gang of road based villains who are running rings around law enforcement bodies the world over. A few cuts later and the team are back together with a load of cool devices, fast motors, well-timed wise cracks and a story which is engaging and easy enough to follow. It also offers some convincing characters, with the established names complemented nicely by Luke Evans' brilliant baddie.

The majority of the film takes place in London. I knew that in advance, which is why I went in expecting the typical Hollywood treatment of the UK: A few red phone boxes, a few policeman with old-style tunics and custodian helmets and shots of places that looked almost nothing like they do in real life. Impressively though - and surprisingly for a rough-and-ready action flick - they'd actually done their homework and gave London a fairly realistic, generous treatment. There were no red phone boxes, custodian helmets or Mary Poppins accents. Instead there were some shots of London that actually looked like London as well as a surprisingly realistic understanding of UK firearms laws and the prominent inclusion in the storyline of the UKs prevalent use of CCTV. Altogether rather impressive. They still had a few US federal agents running round London flashing badges (something which I really think Americans think can happen!) but I guess Rome wasn't built in a day.

Things to look out for in the movie include Dwayne Johnson's flying head-butt, a brilliant (if totally unrealistic) sequence involving a tank and a few unexpectedly good lines. All in all a movie really worth seeing. Hopefully next Years Fast 7 will follow in that trend.

If you're looking for a youth ministry angle, then the key word is family. Watch the film and you'll see what I mean.

[image hotlinked from Wikipedia]

Read More

Movies: The Great Gatsby


Baz Luhrmann is one of those remarkably distinctive directors. Like Scorsese, Zucker and Cronenberg and a handful of others, you can tell within the first few minutes of a movie exactly whose work it is. The hallmarks are everywhere.

My first reaction to the Great Gatsby was that it was Moulin Rouge. Moulin Rouge, that is, a generation or two later and relocated across the Atlantic, but with the cartoon-like sets, lavish dialogue and dance routines still pretty much in tact.

Despite appearances however, this movie isn't a patch on the one that made Luhrmann famous. It has it's good points, for sure, and it's not altogether bad, but it fails to make the audience really engage with the characters and care about them. For most of the movie, I sat there wondering how much longer there was left and lamenting the fact that I hadn't opted to go see Fast 6 or the Hangover 3 instead. It was a close call as I stood in the queue and ultimately, I think, the wrong call!

I had two major problems with the movie: the fact that it was strangely devoid of morality, and the fact that I found it really hard to care about any of the characters.

In Moulin Rouge Ewan McGregor and Nicole Kidman created characters that you really cared about. Ewan McGregor's naive, hopeful young Bohemian and Nicole Kidman's courtesan discovering a love that breaks the hold an immoral world has on her. Throughout the movie you pull for them both in a way that you just don't with the characters in Gatsby. Despite having the likes of Tobey Maguire and Leonardo DiCaprio on board, the movie fails to make it's characters anything more than just vaguely interesting and a little quirky. At the start of the movie you sort of care about Macguire's Carraway, but it doesn't really last that long. The only character who came close to evoking any strong emotion in my mind was the Tom Buchanan character, played excellently by the hugely underrated Joel Edgerton. Mostly though, I just found myself unengaged by the characters, suspecting that Luhrmann had put far too much time into sets and visuals and far too little into directing his actors and getting the script right.

The other big problem I had was with the lack of morality in the movie. The plot revolves around a man trying to ruin a marriage. An intention which is only ever condemned by Tom Buchanan, a character painted as largely unlikeable. Also uncondemned are the fact that the title character made his fortune through crime and swindling, and the hit-and-run death late on in the movie which is essentially covered up by the characters. Only MacGuire's Carraway objects to this, but soon loses his objections once he realises that a different person was responsible to the one he originally suspected. It seems that throughout the movie the clear message is that if you're generally likeable (which they're actually not, but hey!) then you can get away with whatever you like. To be fair, the movie does open by flagging up the fact that it was an immoral age, but it takes the caveat no further than that. This isn't a Mafia movie or the Tudors, in which it's clear from the outset that the characters aren't being held up as a good example. Rather, it sends a clear message that the most important thing in life is to know your own mind and to be sort of interesting with it.

One interesting plot line was the fact that Gatsby first met Daisy when he was a penniless soldier, but felt that with no money he stood no chance with her. The same motiff pops up later when Nick's companion is taken from him by a guy with more money, and therefore with a chance at marrying her. In Gatsby's case he responds not by convincing Daisy of his love for her, but by going away and getting rich. The idea that you have to 'be somebody' to love somebody is perhaps the most dangerous idea in the movie with more than its fair share of them.

You can probably tell that I didn't like this movie, and that's quite rate for me. If you do get talking about it with your young people though, here are some questions you might want to look at...

  • What did the characters do in the story that was wrong?
  • Should Daisy have married Tom in the first place?
  • What impressed Nick about Gatsby? Was he right to be impressed?

[image hotlinked from Wikipedia]

Read More

Brightlights WYD@Home update


 
Interesting news about the exciting Brightlights/ WYD@Home event, which is now just a few months away...

We have several exciting program updates to announce this weekend. The first of which is that star of the BBC shows 'The Monastery' and 'The Big Silence' Father Christopher Jamison will be joining us for the WYD@Home weekend! Here he is discussing the premise of 'The Big Silence' and be sure to check out his Twitter feed: @FrChrisJamison

--

You can book here (and you should!)

The Divine Praises (so beautiful!)


 
So simple (and so beautiful), anyone can sing it!

Divine Praises


From a CD called "Hours" by the Seminarians at John Vianney Seminary in Denver.

Card. Schönborn at the HTB Leadership Conference


The HTB leadership Conference is a huge event each year in London. HTB (Holy Trinity Brompton) is the evangelical Anglican Church that gave us the Alpha course, while Cardinal Schönborn is an Austrian Dominican and a long time friend of Pope Benedict, with whom he co-wrote the Catechism in 1992. So, all in all, a good mix. This video comes to us thanks to Rocco Palmo

Read More

Scott Hahn on Pentecost


Taken from Scott Hahn's awesome blog.

The giving of the Spirit to the new people of God crowns the mighty acts of the Father in salvation history.

The Jewish feast of Pentecost called all devout Jews to Jerusalem to celebrate their birth as God's chosen people, in the covenant Law given to Moses at Sinai (see Leviticus 23:15-21; Deuteronomy 16:9-11).

In today's First Reading the mysteries prefigured in that feast are fulfilled in the pouring out of the Spirit on Mary and the Apostles (see Acts 1:14).

The Spirit seals the new law and new covenant brought by Jesus, written not on stone tablets but on the hearts of believers, as the prophets promised (see 2 Corinthians 3:2-8; Romans 8:2).

The Spirit is revealed as the life-giving breath of the Father, the Wisdom by which He made all things, as we sing in today's Psalm. In the beginning, the Spirit came as a "mighty wind" sweeping over the face of the earth (see Genesis 1:2). And in the new creation of Pentecost, the Spirit again comes as "a strong, driving wind" to renew the face of the earth.

As God fashioned the first man out of dust and filled him with His Spirit (see Genesis 2:7), in today's Gospel we see the New Adam become a life-giving Spirit, breathing new life into the Apostles (see 1 Corinthians 15:45,47).

Like a river of living water, for all ages He will pour out His Spirit on His body, the Church, as we hear in today's Epistle (see also John 7:37-39).

We receive that Spirit in the sacraments, being made a "new creation" in Baptism (see 2 Corinthians 5:17; Galatians 6:15). Drinking of the one Spirit in the Eucharist (see 1 Corinthians 10:4), we are the first fruits of a new humanity - fashioned from out of every nation under heaven, with no distinctions of wealth or language or race, a people born of the Spirit.

Read More

Fr. Barron on 'Modernity and Morality'


More brain food from Fr. B...

Read More

Unwrap the Gifts of the Spirit this Pentecost


A brilliant Pentecost piece from Busted Halo...

On Pentecost Sunday, God breathed the Holy Spirit into the apostles to remind them that they were not alone. Jesus had died, risen from the dead, and ascended into heaven. Jesus' followers were afraid and unsure of their future. The Holy Spirit came to comfort them even though Jesus wasn't there to physically comfort them any more. What does the Holy Spirit mean to us today? Much the same thing it meant for the apostles. We too are recipients of the Spirit, given to help us in our lives. According to Judeo-Christian tradition there are seven Gifts of the Spirit: wisdom, understanding, right judgement, knowledge, courage, reverence, and fear of God. The best part is that you don't have to be religious to use them. These gifts are not beyond us or waiting to be found. They lie within each person waiting to be retrieved and used. And they can be reordered to act as a kind of guide to living out one's life and making decisions. Who doesn't need a little help with that?

Awe (Fear of God)

This is the gift that comes to us when we see the beauty of God's creation around us: a child splashing in a puddle on a sun soaked day, the beauty of nations coming together in peace at the Olympics, the grandeur of a snow-capped mountaintop. The gift of awe lets us see God in all things. It gives us that feeling of hope for our life and world. Maybe I get that feeling when I hear a good song, and I sigh feeling grateful for all God has given me. This is where our lives should start.

Reverence

That awe brings me to my knees in reverence. It's a moment of surrender, like sharing a moment of awe with a friend — words fall quiet. There are

Go, read the rest...

Read More

Movies: Mud


From ICN...

Billed as a 'coming of age' film with a fairly uninspiring title, Mud certainly was not top of the list of flicks I wanted to see this month, writes Afra Morris in Thinking Faith. It is, however, a pleasant surprise that will have you dreaming of sun-dappled days and the adventures of your youth.

Set in Arkansas, it tells the Huckleberry Finn-esque tale of two 14-year-old boys, Ellis (Tye Sheridan) and Neckbone (Jacob Lofland), as they discover and assist the enigmatic 'Mud' (Matthew McConaughey), a fugitive trying to rebuild a boat to float away with his first love, Juniper (Reese Witherspoon). Mud, however, has a chequered past, which the boys gradually uncover, and the group of bounty hunters on his tail add a gentle tension that simmers just below the surface throughout.

One gets the sense that, particularly for a US audience, this film evokes nostalgia for a lifestyle that is fast disappearing. We see the decline of river communities, grubby boys foraging for scrap and building dirt bikes unassisted, and groups of teenagers hanging out at 'strip-malls'.

Director Jeff Nichols has successfully conjured up the essence of laid back southern living in a deliciously soporific fashion that makes you want to experience it for yourself. The beautiful cinematography by Adam Stone has helped to craft a dusty southern landscape that pulls you in, and when McConaughey turns his face to the sun you can almost feel the same dry-heat on your own skin.

Go, read the rest...

Read More

Movies: Star Trek Into Darkness


This review isn't going to be short, so for those of you in a hurry, here's the short version: It's a very good movie, with some great sequences, some lovely effects, and an engaging story. As a Star Trek fan I loved the links to stories past, but yet the two people I was with who weren't so steeped in Trekkie tradition also loved it, so it seems to be a film with universal appeal. Very useable in youth ministry - with the main themes being humility, team work and moral decisions - and very good for your night off. If You're a serious Star Trek fan like me, some bits of the movie will grate with you a little, but you'll also love the little references throw in just for you which everybody else in the cinema will miss!

And now for something a little longer... what follows contains spoilers, by the way, but nothing you probably haven't heard by now anyway.

The movie is the second instalment in the rebooted incarnation of the original Star Trek, which started in 1966 as a TV show. A show which was cancelled after just three series, but which found cult acclaim and was revived a dozen or so years after cancellation as a movie series. Ten movies and four more TV incarnations followed before producer J.J Abrams decided to reboot the original with a new cast in 2009. The first movie was praised for its effects, for its writing and for its cast. The look at the young James Kirk before he joined Starfleet was done extremely well. Kirk joined Starfleet after Bruce Greenwood's Captain Pike (another lovely throwback!) challenged him to be better and to achieve his potential. 

'You can settle for a less than ordinary life, or do you feel like you were meant for something better? Something special?'

A brilliant moment.

But while the 2009 film was brilliant in almost every way, some Star Trek purists were a little bit annoyed at how the story had been framed. The story made clear to the viewers early on that the opening events of the movie - an incursion from the future by a time travelling Romulan terrorist - had changed the future and put them on an alternative timeline. The matter was despatched in a throw-away comment between characters in the movie, a line whose real purpose was to announce to the audience that the new incarnation wouldn't be bound by the stories that had gone before. 

In a way, you could see where they were coming from. It was a quick fix, a simple device which meant they didn't have to be enslaved to the continuity demands of fifty years of writing, but to many Trek fans it felt like a bit of an easy way out. It felt a little disloyal.

I was one of those people, but yet I still loved the 2009 film. They got way more right than wrong.

I mention all this because I think the writers have heeded those concerns and responded to them in the direction they have taken in this second movie, a film which is basically a rather cool alternative-timeline rehash of Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and also partly (mega geek alert here) of the...

Read More

Beyond Words - Sunday May 19th


This week's slice of awesomeness from Mark Hart/ LifeTeen...

Read More

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 167



Revealed Online

Rebuild My Church

Youthwork Magazine

YouCast - Catholic Youth Ministry Podcast

Catholic Youth Ministry Federation